Wednesday, June 5 2024

Hate 1.0 Moral Taxonomy

The rationale for Bill C-63,'s Hate Crime provisions doesn't resolve the moral imperative in play. Between protecting the population based on a set of demographic partitions and protecting it against the spread of hateful attitudes. They tenratively settled on protecting the population from discrimination based on [a subset of] observably consequential distinctions.  Hate is only illegal if it is oriented with respect to an evidently ad-hoc collection of human attributes. -*PS June 6 2024* The legal doctrine of Analagous grounds really says it all https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/analogous-grounds-2/  Arbitrarily extensible. The only group excluded in equity legislation is, lets hear it again kids! Healthy White Males

Canadian government policy against discrimination and hate crimes is built on actions whose motive "prohibited grounds" : race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability or convictions which had been pardoned.

The above “prohibited grounds” are the real soul of the legislation. The lists are already passed into law, but the doubtful conceptual problems raise questions about their application under more draconian regulations.

This is how the legislation defines hate speech

13 (1) It is a discriminatory practice to communicate or cause to be communicated hate speech by means of the Internet or any other means of telecommunication in a context in which the hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.

The decision about such a charge is left with the Committee deciding whether they believe it is likely some angry netizen begins to feel illegal hate. It is entirely possible they fomented legally permissible hate or no such person exists. There doesn’t need to be a victim. State your motivation, state your case for hate.. You can be reported by anyone. The HR committee, based on social justice, has spent years of remonstrances for own racism. After spending years discovering their own racism, it would be problematic to allow the nonexistence of a white-supremacist deflect from the realities of his hateful reaction.

The bill adds other hate crimes, but in all cases the act must be motivated by “prohibited grounds” is relevant to them all.

Here’s a nasty one: It gives the sentencing judge unlimited discretion.

318 (1) Every person who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.
320.‍1001 (1) Everyone who commits an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament, if the commission of the offence is motivated by hatred based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.

 

Let's try a thought experiment. Let’s choose traits not enumerated as prohibited grounds. My question is what if an alternative taxonomy correlate with one the Prohibited grounds? Would that be considered a backdoor proxy for illegal discrimination?’

Pick up this question later I want to revisit. Such correlations can be interpreted through the lense of bigotry. Based on my reading of the Canadian Human Rights, Anti-racism work (chrc-ccdp.gc.ca) I should expect projection. Although they do not handle criminal charges, hate crime is their wheelhouse. You should ask them

The prohibited motivations are not well organized or logical. Experience suggests neither the of illicit motive nor the perpetrators and victims will be treated equally. This will not be based upon the lament of the victim. It will be based on their identity. Therefore, beware. If you are taking risks these political issues involved, you will be the sinister white man. 

Some traits [Reading the Koran. Might well be a Muslim. Soddomy. Might well be Gay. Drooling sycophant who folds under the first sight of pressure. That’s a conservative.]

The reason this concerns me is these “prohibited grounds” are not consistent. Not in the nature of the attribute, population classified. The Hate Crimes list the same “prohibited grounds” principle, but those grounds are not equivalent. Disputes over race and Religion and race are vastly more consequential than age.

 

Canadians may have to decide what is uniquely disgusting and corrupt about someone they hate before openly declaring hatred, Instead of saying, “I hate the Jews” we’ll be confined to denouncing “I hate the executive heads at Lion’s Foot Studios. They are scum.”

The possible prison time for “downplaying” the holocaust is 5 years prison (You had better brush up on David Irving before you discuss the holocost manufacturers..

----

discrimination as moral accusation. The use of discrimination is not necessarily an act of malice. And hiring practice and so-on which puts some part of a protected category at a disadvantage. This is not possible and makes no sense whatsoever. Such ambiguity or logical incoherence gives the Human Rights Commission very good cover. It could take a lot of time, a lot of work and the residual uncertainty may be significant.

 

The 1995 Employment Equity Act is among Canada’s outstanding busybody laws. For some reason many people are not aware of its existence. Federally regulated businesses are obligated to hire visible minorities in proportion to their overall population. [Or in the applicant pool] Companies must keep records of their efforts to achieve this and can be audited at any time.

Employers are expected to increase retention of ‘under-represented’ groups by using promotions and pay raises. That level of management.

Here’s the trick: White males are explicitly excluded. So that is one way to satisfy the appetite for equality.

p.s. The ideological blinkers are very similar to those in Germany https://modernity.news/2024/05/07/german-politician-fined-6k-for-pointing-to-governments-own-stats-on-rapes-by-migrants/  Coming to a parliament near you.

Monday, May 27 2024

Hate Quest: Discriminating Vilification.

 Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those who say this are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by the unbelievers? Islam says: Kill them, put them to the sword and scatter their armies…. Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for the Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other (Qur’anic) psalms and Hadiths urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all this mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim. -Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini

 

Discrimination. Canada's government has prohibited statements that cause hate. It does not say why people hate. Precedent may make them better more men who carefully relate events, this meticiously master of what the reaer will know. liars 

This sitting of Canadian Government as of 2024-05-27roscribes this. Although not index but citations are not illegal on my part. But Allatoya will face his creator having conveyed his message so well, "content that incites violent extremism or terrorism means content that actively encourages a person to commit — or that actively threatens the commission of — for a political, religious or ideological purpose, an act of physical violence against a person or an act that causes property damage, with the intention of intimidating or denouncing the public or any section of the public or of compelling a person, government or domestic or international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act, and that, given the context in which it is communicated, could cause a person to commit an act that could cause"

This too is not only likely to spread villification, but it has already inspired detestation. Fortunately these are legislators in whose great wisdom declined to define the law with respect to politics. They would have to imprison a substantial portion of their population. *edit* correction. Political affiliation has been proposed in another bill. Adding to the inherent contradiction and making these liberal communists even more legitimate targets of opprobrium.

319(2) Wilful promotion hatred (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty  --- 5 YEARS

Wilfully in the sense of intentional? This analytical paper related to the ongoing political warfare with muslims. https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Stephen-Coughlin-Thesis.pdfh he wants to avoid as much violence by sharing proper education Given how nation came to this juncture, we will not avoid ugliness.. Prepare accordingl.y. Just remember: WHen we're breaching this peace, it's an improvement. Punishable under Canadian law, but a great improvement.

I am posting quotes from and the link too. It is likely, indeed inevitable, that once of the groups which inthemselves inspire hatred, contempt, should be vilified and detested and may have to be stopped by

Continue reading

Saturday, May 18 2024

A Nation of Diversity Riddled With Metastatic Colonies

It's a poor, landlocked section of India, but Canada pays us tribute. Flushing dismembered babies down abortion room drains is fair trade. The humanitarian virtue of labor mobility seems to be a characteristic conceit of affluence. I suppise all of us like to assume our benificence supervene on obedience. An aristocratic leap onto the passing bandwagon. They're recent migrants, working hard to enrich him. He feasts on solipstic glee knowing they're sure to take him where he's going.

Continue reading

Coordinated Targeted Attacks take scores not thousamds to parylize a state.

2 man groups in 50 cities. At the same time. Normally distributed, https://rumble.com/v4vyibl-coffee-with-scott-adams-51824.html?e9s=rel_v1_b  22 minutes in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75zmIj_4LFQ

No emedding yet,  It's a religious war. Body count at any given stage 

Continue reading

Sunday, May 12 2024

Hate Speech Laws: An Overture of Friendship

I made friendly, trusting people to understand the choice in their heart of hearts. I want people to pray for the strength to sustain ruthless violence. I want to make them see the swarming burrows of investation. That I could give them eyes which mark the subtlety itself of the suberters's disguise. I want to tell them our enmity includes all their virtues enslaved in service of their crimes.

 

"Definition of “hate speech”

The Bill would define “hate speech” in the CHRA and empower individuals and groups to file complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission against users who post hate speech online. As part of the proposed amendments, “hate speech” would be defined based on Supreme Court of Canada decisions. The Bill defines “hate speech” as the content of a communication that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of prohibited grounds of discrimination."

...3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.

 

Welcome, welcome.  I suppose you don't understand why I'm here with open arms. 

Continue reading

Thursday, May 9 2024

Protester franchises For Black Lives and Palestine

Some parcohial considerations on geopolitics.  Well, they're out there banging drums, "yallahs!" and honks from passing cars. "Free Free Palestine." There seem to be franchises of political protestors who act for some Cause de jure.. 

A franchise is a franchise. What seemed like a local fixture is a surrogate for global arbitrage of outrage.  The managers don't know all the other ones. Where there are conferences, they may collaborate, but they are told the narrative and format to follow. It's the similarity of simultaneous events and the appearance of foreign, affluent organizers in cities all over. There is no reason to get to know each-other in a finely meshed network.   They all do the same job and social groups may rarely cross paths until the next time.

Continue reading

Tuesday, April 9 2024

Political epistemology: Epostemic Virtue in Academia

The epistemology of poltitical speech is normally subordinated to power earned by dialectic traps.

In the context of a Scholarship, decorum can make the difference between interesting and discrediting. I really do want to kn how far gone they are in that frame. Although disinformation research is carried out in environments where libertarians are the rightmost of  the overton window, the lessons they learn took massive resources and hints for dissidents are in the bargain bin.

Continue reading

Neurobiology Gemini Discusses An Epileptic

The anatomy of the brain is something I now approach with trepedation Quite frankyly, I don't want to test my aability.

For the time being it goes up. Posts woll be winnowed later,

Continue reading

- page 1 of 4