Political epistemology
much more readily now I just lost all that where would they go So the anonymous and colony could be much larger And you're they're more interchangeable whereas a non anonymous groups they can only have like 150 ants because they have to be able to recognize each other by smell we would do it by symbolically anyway Such as
rumor/fake/disinformation news detection prevention
inference
hate speech
scaffolding
Saodat Muminova
Description of the marketing strategy and its key components - Explanation of what makes this marketing strategy innovative and unique - Comparison with competitors and how it differentiates the brand - Lessons that other businesses can learn from this case study
Cite
Download full-text
(Clark, 1997
informatin evn Sterelny (2003)
researchgate.net
google scholar
\science direct
and as counterintuitive because you're taught because you're always taught that the fight is over ideology it's because they believe in this policy that tax policy but really it's a post hawk exposed facto
I think you're right - under most circumstances it's banal.
I went onto google scholar this morning to read the abstracts on topics like misinfoormation. I am stunned. Must have skimmed a hundred article. The enterprise is massive. It includes theoretical groundwork for future projects to pursue long term information warfare . I wonder what's already being deployed. I would imagine wuite a lot because many of these strategoes would ne very doffoci;t to detect, even if it wasn/t passive analytical surveillance. All matter of Gaslightins, mathematics to map black box networks. I swa two articles on the art of "hostile cognitive scaffolding" I glanced at the absctract. It has soetjomgA functional utility a possibly unwitting party to perfor, some task in a manner that unintentionally damages amother target! Cool.
Since I am so far from the educated social strata, still curious what these technicians think the the propaganda operation this. I knew some doctors, like the Neuro-pathologist who understood people were dying in numbers it's astonishing they could keep of thhe news. By next CrisisMas season the narrative control will deploay better strategic targeting with more effectove and cunning equipment.
whose behalf, exactly, these researchers believe it will be used? I was cynical about the comparative silence, but having read your piece I did read you're right: Nobody. It's all intended to protect! But of course. When a cowering public goes online, they'll eed protectiom againsnt comments from dangerous loonss.
But in seriousness, this was a question I never resolved while people were still afraid of guano. I could smell a bat in 2019, but surely by 2022, large number suspected they'd been had... right?
*PS* This after reading a bit about virtie ethics epistemic humility I wonder Maybe on a contentious issue where people are afraid, information is being hidden from them and jobs are entangled in power politics, yelling coontemptuousy in front of all of them while being almost entorely ignorant of their invilvement isn't the best way to find ouy ewhat they believe... You know, until this moment, I never seriously considered *actually doing* that?
These academics are clearly geniuses. But are they saturnine enough to realize what was done last time? The master stroke of cultivating animate foes to suppliament public anxieties about a virus? When we are afraid, a certain instict tempts us to blame someone. Lord knows they have no god and it's hard to predice how people people react when Gen. Faucci Jr. Says say, "Don't worry/YOU'RE ALL GONNA DIE!".
It can help if the subject of their ire is close to home. They'll be found out if we teach a touch of discourse theory. Ensure everyone tallks about the same problem the being fixed[up as we speak].
told.
The gpvernnment will know which arguments and rhetoric dissidents use. They can pass around caricatured version. It's recpgmozable yet offensovely stupid. They'll be on the look-out but immunized from being seduced because we'll use operant conditioning with something revoltingly stupid.
Just enough to recignize rhetoric, not listen.
Intellectual humility is so charming, when you brought up I started behaving better. I pride myself on being open minded, but have I ever been buffaloed into changing my worldview. I can only remember instances when I was aline, quiet or calm.
I have contemplated its intellectual advantages even outside of social context, haven't read about reputation managemanet or its an evolutionary role. You knoe, this is information that could really stick. hm!
I might have just gotten a huge favor sir, reputation management as an evolutionary concept. My repuation strategy has been online anonymity and staying out of public. If I can stick with it, I'll be back to thank you later.
It's not even primarily because the habit of screaig First of all, as an concept iw new to me. I would think of press agents.
Since I was a kid online, I badly imitated polemicists, comfortable nobody was listening,
I always enjoy seeing someone brace themselves for a debate / discussion with a maligned opponent who in reality has intellectual humility., only to find their polemics die on their lips, visibly shocked that two mouths and four ears are woth them.
Even on a heated issue, it makes me receptive. There is
Humans have limits in their capacity to assess each-other. It onlu seems otherwise because in many cases, the set of attributes they need to identify is quite small. For those who exercise power or conceit. this much functionally satisfies their curiosity
Some circumstances will require we make a judgment call about people.. For a wise guy, an adequate guess is as good as an inference. When he notices a mote in someone's eye Since you're useless It's a classic he the premisee which his rea
An adequate decision is a bulls eye for the wise guy. justify their , rely on it. understand all the circumstances judgement
information circumstances d all the information limited is reliable judged sufficient t
limited to having their judgement relied upon and understanding and having passed judgeement
Circumstance may require remix We must rrely on the understanding we had at the time..
sufficient proof their understanding must be relied upom.
understanding are
must be relied upon their jude
understanding must be relied upom.
circumstances proes sufficient, know exactly wwhat is going on and they know why
sufficient, they
will not allow the speed of the
make the right ce that turns out to be correct and that is all they need to know about the person place or thing
made the right decision indicates they have nothing more to learn
the acquire no more information about the circumstances or the person
it truly is spectacular and we should celebrate it. My skill in reputation management is nonexistent. People who are certifiably devoted to human dignity immediately realize that I'm a deplorable bigot.
truly devoted to the dignity of all people care the most of any of us about the dignity of human beings immediately decide I'm a terrible person.
primarily anonymity. so you know I have a bad reputation some people who are developing these misinformation counter misinformation systems but
I would be interested in seeing this research because it will bear out the impression that it's an indicator of how they will treat other people. Now
But it also speaks well of their judgment will say. Humility this is a fact bad habits have accrued for me because I don't matter nobody listens to me so I can shoot off I can become plentiful and satirical but it really is a bad habit because of the amount of time people spend on the Internet it's no longer just a hobby it's ubiquitous and passing around bad blood is not helpful and I feel bad about it
hurts their interests.] Building user profiling to individualize their interventions..
Fairly soon, they'll have working systems that disguise shadow banning by only disrupting communication with people who might be susceptible.... I could go on, and this is the first time I've looked at it.
Now I appreciate the 2nd Ammendmt.
