Humpty Dumpty Words. You'll Never Reconstruct Language Again

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”

― Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass

Words like Islamophobia, Racism, Discrimination are sequences of letters found in legislation and in epithets.  They might be called Humpty Dumpty words because expedience is inherent in their meaning. They could also be called be Trojan Words because they are a weapon, and to accept any proposition involving it implies subjugation to the rule of Marxist ideology.

I will occasionally use pronouns "word" or "term", but in this context, they are really Religious and Political Narratives.

 Troy allowed that it was a wooden model that resembled a horse. That qualification was insufficient. Because they did not clearly understood that it was not a horse, it was not a gift, it was not inanimate, their entire city was destroyed. 

A normal word can be used in legislation. Language is intepreted so its application is consistent or its subject matter is identifiable. Someone reading the text can might form a concept of where it fits into the body of law. The courts and individuals are bound by its propositions.  

Humpty dumpty words mean whatever you say they mean. They are not part of any law in which it appears, it is the law. They are not the facially appealling narratives they present themselves as. Logical constructions in legislation are subordinate to an ideology which is not bound by logic, but by power.  Such is the nature of hate speech laws.

They cannot be defined like normal words, and their inconsistencies will show up in language models which integrate them. They will prove to be purpose built, since the semiotic key is the political project, not its ostensible role in language. Interrogating a language model on chat GPT shows clear evidence in the case of "discrimination", it being unable to thread the needle between discernment and bigotry.

To explain its usage, providing examples of sentences which contain it are insufficient. They are endlessly capable of generating homonyms. You need to understand its strategic application as a weapon.


At this moment I discovered

"From the beginning, therefore, the Islamophobia LOE the Organization of Islamic CoOperation (OIC) operationalizes, that Islamic Movement groups like the Muslim Brotherhood execute domestically, reflects the full leveraging and co-option of a Neoclassic Marxist campaign, a classic “aufheben der Kultur” effort – and not the other way around."

Further examination of these methods from Unconstrained Analytics:

Add a comment

HTML code is displayed as text and web addresses are automatically converted.

Add ping

Trackback URL :

Page top