Gender Affirmation

Gender Affirmation gender affirmation is abuse perpetrated under the guise of kindness. The phrase is Orwellian gaslighting. It is, in fact, a rejection of gender identity. By using using hormonal and physical mutilation a mental problem becomes the locus of identity. This formerly rare disorder usually worked itself out with puberty. The use of puberty blockers prevents exactly the means by which a person can overcome this illness.

The rationale given, the ostensible frame, is to affirm people for who they are. It cloaks vile physical abuse in kindness. People are loathe to reject other people's sense of identity, so it has not been vigorously challenged.

Here are some analogies: If a person has a sprained ankle, we don't expect them to run races. To make them feel better, we paralyze them by breaking their spine. What, do you hate disabled people, bigot?

If a person has a paranoid delusion about people being out to get them, they are treated like outcasts. We see schizophrenics on the streets and the outcome seems unfair. Thus, we must accept their premise: we're all out to get them. We should tell them we want to implant nighmarish thoughts with a conspiracy of psychic demonism.

A child is sexually abused by an adult, thus develops unhealthy sexual habits, addictions and gets drawn into prostitution. The government must subsidize their pimps as a matter of compassion.

You see how insane it is.

Why I Embrace Conspiracy Theory

Oxford. Richard Dolan On the concept of conspiracy theory. "The United States comprises large organizations – corporations, bureaucracies, ‘interest groups,’ and the like – which are conspiratorial by nature. That is, they are hierarchical, their important decisions are made in secret by a few key decision-makers, and they are not above lying about their activities. Such is the nature of organizational behaviour. ‘Conspiracy,’ in this key sense, is a way of life around the globe.

I blame Milles Mathis fore the nudge that sent me over the deep end. A surprisingly consequential cascade proceeded from a subtle insight. Consequently, I realize the explanatory inevitability of very large scale intelligence operations which guide and manipulate us. to defer to their otherwise unacceptable ambition.

The bull headed skepticism of the conspiracy theory opens your mind to possibilities you’d otherwise write off. The rejection of the obvious, in a curious way, feeds off the readiness to at least contemplate the unlikely

enter image description here

In North America, conspiracy theorists, particularly white ones, have been cited as a  primary nexus of domestic violent extremism. Attacking white conspiracy theorists is not just a convenient way to burnish anti terrorism credentials without political costs as among Muslims,it pleases the great SJW Racially can’t afford this liability indefinitely.

However, there is something to be said for claiming conspiracy theory is dangerous. It represents a willingness to discard gate-keepers. Things “everyone agrees on” are often the most important assumptions to discard. It seems more risky to get rid of premises everyone else agrees on. To that I’d post the question: Is the official narrative particularly reliable because it is taken for granted?

Mathis helped me explicitly look at the intuition that it’s more parsimonious to avoiid making additional assumptions. I realized that it is not necessary to assume that the official narrative is the center of epistemic gravity, as it were. To the contrary, in many cases we can identify both why and how lies are introduced as a premise. Without needing to prove it is a lie [in our politics, it’s more the rule than the exception that lies are a central dogma. ], the plausibility of a hypothesis is unaffected.

New readers grimly have introduced the idea that white supremacy is the most dangerous violent extremist. From the outset, the assumption that ethnic self-preservation is extremist. Here we see the lie: It is exclusively whites who do not have a right to self-preservation. This has been assiduously cultivated by jews.

This belief is affirmed by federal law enforcement in both America and Canada. If I recall correctly, conspiracy theory was mentioned in both cases. This is no co-incidence. Some might argue it is not most parsimonious to suppose actual coordination. Media organizations have long been a primary target of intelligence operations. It would beggar belief if this is not the case here - particularly because the government is financing them and are ideological dopplegangers.

The coordination of covid narratives is exactly the same story. Although commonalities in education are a possible explanation, they are also the vector by which intelligence agents are introduced.

Establishing enforcing shared narratives doesn’t strictly require a conspiracy

Evidently, both America and Canada’s law enforcement are having trouble drumming up examples of white ideologues being motivated to political violence. As I insinuated, this is a shame, but the fact remains that America’s federal law enforcement was obligated to creating an example to support their claim. Therefore, Michigan FBI agents and lawyers launched a fairly large entrapment operation involving the kidnap of Michigan governor whitmer along with the alien in her head. Over the course of several weeks, a crew of plainclothes FBI agents sought out young men and tried to persuade them to help kidnap the governor and the gestating alien. Eventually they and extracted enough to arrested the men. The very small number of patsies was obviously illegal entrapment, but the FBI legal team prepared a favorable venue,had unlimited financial resources and political backing. These guys don’t seem to have been pretty perspicacious, but it was grossly unjust. Instead of terrifying society playing pool and swapping theories, they were locked in for hard time. Society was safe again.

This was widely and repetitiously reported, often in discussion with the phony imbroglio - also involving incitement by government agents. Even with all those FBI agents and their legal team and supports, they wouldn’t be able to cope with the rapes, assaults, robberies and murders in Detroit that weekend. Without critical analysis or dissent, the apparent magnitude of events are vastly exaggerated.

The public has neural connections primed to react in the desired manner: If you notice conspiracies and you are violent and dangerous. The viewers were expected to overlook that these were actually sinister conspiracies, demonstrable and admitted. Using a conspiracy to discredit conspiracies was audacious, but so long as news stations remained on script, it is extremely effective.

Here is another reason it is so important to pay attention to conspiratorial angles: Common messaging is a massive red flag. It’s also what makes it effective. Those who reject conspiracies broadly will be duped and unaware of how obvious it is..

The Medically induced plagues demonstrates that our public has virtually no resistance to this process, even now.

Intelligence has been perfecting these practices for years. Considering unacceptable viewpoints requires the capacity to deal with more uncertainty, but I see no alternative to taking on that cognitive load.. Children are educated in a manner that makes consensus the center of our assumptions. When events are frightening, widely accepted nonsense creates perfect conditions for mass formation. Quite literally, in the absence of conspiracy theories, we will go insane.

Orientalism: A matter of national security

[An entry from July 2021]

With the terms of art and doctrinal background, it is not hard to find detailed information about these organizations. Our leaders cannot or will not admit it. The only mention I've seen was in committee on Parliament, and by an individual who had already been retired from CSIS. He stated a key fact: specificity on the language of our enemy is a pre-requisite to forming effective countermeasures.

Bill Warner is probably the best resource on ideologically specific information. Stephen Coughlin approaches the topic from defense intelligence construction, also stressing that the element of knowing the doctrines and history are a matter of public moment. But for its application in Canada, much is unchanged in Jihad. Same old tiger, same old stripes.

S.K. Malik, "Reliance of the Traveller", Raymond Ibraham, Richard Spencer, all provide "milestones" the "bridges" where interfaith influence operations can be seen in action. It's not hard to find the organizational connections between "conservative" Muslims and active terrorist organizations. Once you know the terms of art and the objectives, it's trivial. Mohammed was nothing if not unambiguous on the eschatology of Islam.

Recognizing useful idiots on the subject of Islam: Their words will not trace both the esoteric and the facile meanings of the words simultaneously. Islam means the peace of total subjugation. Any other construction is A)incoherent or B)instrumental. The practical distinction between liar and fool narrows as the officeholder becomes more powerful.

Ignorance of Islam is resolute in Canada. The Polish mental band MGLA calls it the "style of total denial." I'm somewhat apprehensive at the public absence of orientalists, of Europeans who can understand these foreigners on their own terms. As I said, specific intelligence is impossible to come by without identifying the opponent.

Gender Affirmation

gender affirmation is abuse perpetrated under the guise of kindness. The phrase is Orwellian gaslighting. It is, in fact, a rejection of gender identity. By using using hormonal and physical mutilation a mental problem becomes the locus of identity. This formerly rare disorder usually worked itself out with puberty. The use of puberty blockers prevents exactly the means by which a person can overcome this illness.

The rationale given, the ostensible frame, is to affirm people for who they are. It cloaks vile physical abuse in kindness. People are loathe to reject other people's sense of identity, so it has not been vigorously challenged.

Here are some analogies: If a person has a sprained ankle, we don't expect them to run races. To make them feel better, we paralyze them by breaking their spine. What, do you hate disabled people, bigot?

If a person has a paranoid delusion about people being out to get them, they are treated like outcasts. We see schizophrenics on the streets and the outcome seems unfair. Thus, we must accept their premise: we're all out to get them. We should tell them we want to implant nighmarish thoughts with a conspiracy of psychic demonism.

A child is sexually abused by an adult, thus develops unhealthy sexual habits, addictions and gets drawn into prostitution. The government must subsidize their pimps as a matter of compassion.

You see how insane it is.

https://667-per-cm.net/

"good standard actuarial determination from the government are, when they rely upon local sources for basic determinations?" May be disguising what's really going on, how closely connected events have become.. https://667-per-cm.net/2020/05/17/covid-19-statistics-a-caveat-sources-of-data-matter/ "The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Tracker site https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-map is a major project displaying COVID-19-related statistics. ... I’ve read and understood their approach and methodology...." He says.

He refers to valuable reference points. New York Times' Github sitehttps://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data and the COVID Tracking Project https://covidtracking.com/ which is operated in association with Atlantic Magazine. The COVID Tracking Project, as far as I know, does not have a Github, but they offer a data portal. Covid Tracking project data portal https://covidtracking.com/api

"not only does Johns Hopkins differ from the COVID Tracking Project, the disparity grows over time."enter image description here :A deficit I can understand, but wiggles and bumps are harder to grok.: enter image description here Tucked away out of sight of the stream of news.

On the order of 40,000 or more covid related deaths per quarter, as of Sept %Taking at least 1,2,3 doses respectively 1) 98.1% 2) 96.4% 3) Dose71.8%

April 23 Trilesitenews

"Australia and New Zealand to South Korea and now China, highly transmissible variants such as Omicron and BA.2 at least, in some locations exaggerate existing vaccine durability challenges intensifying localized or regional viral surges. " "As reported by TS News, just over a week ago regions in Australia experience growing numbers of not only breakthrough infections but also breakthrough hospitalizations and even deaths, such as in the Australian state of Queensland. TS News has been reporting on a disturbing trend in some heavily vaccinated populations such as in Australia, where SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, and even death are higher now than at any time during the pandemic."

How high? On the order of 40,000 deaths per quarter.
" Twice as many people have died from COVID-19 this year in Australia (and the year is less than four months old) than in the previous two years there. How is that possible? "

Early Musings on The Rule of Law

Karl Deinninger https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=231471

You should close this website and immediately navitate to Karl Denninger

The harassment and bullying of Churches, their leaders and members is a measure of the good faith in which authorities have implemented law. Apologies suffice for the illuminated leaders. For their hypocritical public indiscretions, redoubled devotion is considered suitable penance.

I take as a matter of record that these rules have been applied partially. In the case of Churches, we're seeing a vindictiveness and capriciousness with no natural endpoint.

The messaging has been "Common rules, laid out by authorities in the interest of public safety". It seemed to jibe with grade school civics and there didn’t seem to be an obvious rejoinder.


The Problem of Illegitimate Laws Which Seem Legitimated Under The Doctrine.

~~~~

The failure of laws to be equally enforced explicitly contravenes the logic of the doctrine as most people understand it. Many people are learning why the hard way.

However, arbitrariness in formulating orders can be just as essential. In extremis, the problem is identical to inconsistent application. Jurisdiction-wide edicts are well within the capability of despots.  Elastic laws which change weekly, with every pretextual contingency,  have the same trait of arbitrariness.

In effect, of course they cannot be applied consistently. For such "laws" to undermine the rule of law, they don't need to fail for lack of equal application.  Yes, even if it applies to everyone in all specified circumstances.  If the circumstances are specified for each new ad-hoc rule, there is no  meaningful difference in effect.

In the guise of "the rule of law" his unfair and unreasonable bullying will continue to be available to anyone cynical and connected enough to deploy the methods. Even if they were not calibrated precisely to deny equal recourse - which they are - the process of forming rules itself is compromising the legitimacy of our rulers.

It's not Churchgoers who have been lawless here, but the regime.